On May 27, SpaceX’s Dragon 2 capsule will launch aboard a Falcon 9 rocket sending NASA astronauts Bob Behnken and Doug Hurley to the International Space Station. The lift-off will mark the return of orbital human spaceflight from the USA for the first time since the Space Shuttle retired in 2011. To mark this event I have re-blogged an updated version of my post from earlier this year on this topic. Interestingly, astronauts always spend a period of time in quarantine before visiting the ISS, because people’s immune system become weakened while in space and medical supplies are limited on the ISS. With the current Covid-19 emergency NASA will need to be doubly careful.
Updated original post below—–
2020 should be an important year for manned space flight. America should put American astronauts into space on an American spacecraft, the first time this has happened since 2011. Interestingly, it will be on a spacecraft designed and built by a commercial organisation rather than by NASA.
The landing of Atlantis on 21 July 2011, which brought the Space Shuttle programme to a close – Image from NASA.
As most of my readers will know, since the retirement of the Space Shuttle in July 2011, America no longer has the capacity to put astronauts into orbit around the Earth. Instead, it has been in the awkward situation of having to rely on the Russian Soyuz spacecraft to ferry astronauts to and from the International Space Station (ISS). This situation should finally change in 2020; later this year there are missions planned to take astronauts to the ISS on American spacecraft.
As a result of a major change in space policy by the Obama administration ten years ago, and continued under Donald Trump, these missions will be in spacecraft designed and built by private companies, rather than NASA.
NASA makes a change of direction
The Boeing CT-100 Starliner Space Capsule – image from NASA. In 2021 this spacecraft is planned to take astronauts to and from the ISS.
In a speech in 2010, US President Obama announced a major shift in the function of NASA in American human space flight:
‘By buying the services of space transportation — rather than the vehicles themselves — we can continue to ensure rigorous safety standards are met. But we will also accelerate the pace of innovations as companies — from young startups to established leaders — compete to design and build and launch new means of carrying people and materials out of our atmosphere. ….
Some have said, for instance, that this plan gives up our leadership in space by failing to produce plans within NASA to reach low Earth orbit, …. But we will actually reach space faster and more often under this new plan, in ways that will help us improve our technological capacity and lower our costs, which are both essential for the long-term sustainability of space flight.’
(White House press release 2010)
So, rather than build its own spacecraft to replace the Space Shuttle, NASA awarded grants to private companies to support research and development into human space flight. The program had several phases. In the first phase five companies were awarded grants to partially fund the research and development of the key technologies and capabilities that could ultimately be used in human space transportation systems. In the next phases, NASA awarded further grants to four companies to develop spacecraft that could send astronauts to the ISS.
After another selection process, in 2014 NASA made the final decision that the winners of the contracts for up to six crewed flights to transport astronauts to and from the ISS were as follows:
- Boeing – They were given a contract worth up to $4.2 billion, to transport astronauts on their CST-100 Starliner spacecraft.
- Space X – A company set up by Elon Musk, who among his many achievements is the founder of Tesla motors and the co-founder of Paypal. SpaceX were given a contract worth up to $2.6 billion to transport astronauts on their Dragon 2 spacecraft (pictured below).
For more details see NASA (2014).
The Dragon 2 Spacecraft – image from NASA
When the final decision was made it was anticipated that the winning companies would be able to launch manned missions to the ISS by 2017. This turned out be overoptimistic. There have been numerous delays in the development of both spacecraft and over the last few years the launch dates have kept slipping. For example, in 2019 there were the following mishaps.
- In April 2019, there was a setback when a Dragon 2 spacecraft was destroyed by an explosion caused by a faulty valve during an unmanned test
- In December 2019 the CST-100 was launched on an unmanned test flight, which was supposed to dock with the ISS. However, due to an error in the spacecraft’s clock, the engine fired at the wrong time. It was placed into an incorrect orbit and so was unable to dock with the station.
Success for SpaceX
After the failure in December another critical software bug was found, which could have resulted in damage to the CST-100 preventing a safe landing. As a result, Boeing have agreed to investigate fully the causes of the failures and repeat the unmanned test flight in October this year. Assuming this test is successful, and there are no further mishaps, the CST-100 should fly to the ISS sometime in 2021
By comparison there have been no more major mishaps with the Dragon 2 spacecraft and NASA are happy that it is safe enough for astronauts to fly in. So, according to the NASA launch schedule, (https://www.nasa.gov/launchschedule/), it will launch on a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket on May 27 with astronauts Doug Hurley and Bob Behnken aboard. This should be followed by a second Dragon 2 mission in September, which will take four American astronauts to the ISS. A third mission with another four astronauts aboard is planned for early 2021.
NASA astronauts Doug Hurley and Bob Behnken who in 2020 are planned to become the first astronauts since July 2011 to go into orbit on a American spacecraft – image from NASA.
Opportunities for space tourism
The contract terms are that both companies will charge NASA around $60 million for each astronaut on a flight to the ISS. This is slightly cheaper than the amount it pays to the Russian space agency. The real boost is that rather than the money going to the Russian space agency, it will go to American companies, boosting American high technology industries and creating American jobs.
Once they have fulfilled their contractual commitments to NASA, both companies will be free to sell additional spare capacity to space tourists willing to spend around $60 million for a flight into orbit. Even at this extremely high price tag there would a high demand among the super-rich. In fact, between 2001 and 2009 seven individuals paid up to $40 million for a trip into orbit on a Soyuz rocket. After 2009 space tourism was halted because the Russians had no spare capacity.
The French Canadian Guy Laliberte, founder of Cirque du Soleil, paid $40 million for a 11 day trip into space in 2009. Image from NASA
In March 2019 American Vice President Mike Pence surprised many people when he announced an extremely ambitious plan to put American astronauts on the Moon in 2024. This would be the last year in office for President Trump (assuming of course he wins this year’s election). NASA has named its new manned Moon programme Artemis, after Apollo’s sister in Greek mythology.
Its first mission would be a crew-less test of the Space Launch System, the powerful launcher currently in development. It is scheduled for late 2020, although many expect the launch to slip to 2021. The second flight in 2022 — the first with astronauts aboard — would orbit but not land, on the Moon.
On the third flight in 2024, astronauts would first travel to the lunar Gateway, a satellite which would be in or,bit around the Moon. From the lunar Gateway they would take another spacecraft to the Moon’s surface.
It will be interesting to see if these very ambitious timescales will be met, particular as the effect due to the Covid-19 emergency is not yet known.
I hope you have enjoyed this post. To find out more about Explaining Science, click on the Home link at the top of this page.
NASA (2014) NASA chooses American companies to transport U.S. astronauts to International Space Station, Available at: https://www.nasa.gov/press/2014/september/nasa-chooses-american-companies-to-transport-us-astronauts-to-international (Accessed: 1 January 2020).
The White House (2010) Remarks by the president on space exploration in the 21st century, Available at: https://www.nasa.gov/news/media/trans/obama_ksc_trans.html(Accessed: 1 January 2020).
8 thoughts on “First American crewed spaceflight since 2011”
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] Source link […]
I’m not sure I’m happy about private companies taking people into space, just because huge corporations tend to cut corners on everything, which obviously would be disastrous for the astronauts. And I don’t much like the idea of space tourism, because only the wealthy will be able to take advantage of it. At the same time, I think it’s time US astronauts went back to the Moon, as well as going to Mars. If we can get astronauts to the Moon and Mars more quickly, it will definitely be a good thing.
You make some interesting points
LikeLiked by 1 person
What is wrong with taking advantage of the wealthy?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I suppose that anyone who was rich enough to pay ~$40 million to ~$60 million for a seat on a orbital spacecraft flight would regard it as money well spent and it might be a small fraction of their overall net worth ! 😉
For example, Guy Laliberte is worth well over $1 billion !
Indeed. Nothing wrong with the happy few being able to take advantage of space flight opportunities or private planes for that matter.