Advantages of solar energy

As shown in the graph and table below, most renewable electricity is generated by hydroelectric power. Solar energy lies in third place behind wind.

Electricity generated from renewable sources. From Our world in data (2018). The ‘Others’ category includes biofuels  (e.g. burning wood, animal and agricultural wastes), geothermal energy and wave/tidal power)

Despite only being in third place the growth in solar electricity has been spectacular over the last 20 years and,  in addition to having an almost unlimited potential, it has a number of other advantages over other types of renewable energy, which I’ll talk about in this post.

Growth in electricity generation by renewables from 1996 to 2016

Domestic electricity meters measure consumption in kilowatt hours. One terawatt hour (TWh)  is equal to one billion kilowatt hours.


Environmental impact of different types of renewables

The environmental impact of large hydroelectric installations such as the Hoover Dam is enormous. After construction, large areas become flooded – sometimes destroying biologically rich and productive land. Damming interrupts the flow of rivers and can harm local ecosystems, and building large dams and reservoirs usually involves displacing people and wildlife. Over the last 50 years, tens of millions of people have been forced to leave their homes, which have disappeared under large reservoirs.

The Hoover Dam constructed between 1931 and 1936 can generate up to 2 gigawatts  (2 billion watts) of electric power

One particular risk of hydroelectric power is flooding. Over the past decades there have been many disasters where dams have failed, and people have lost their lives in the ensuing floods. The worst event occurred in 1975 in China where, according to Human Rights Watch, between 86,000 and 230,000 died as a result of a catastrophic dam failure which the Chinese government kept quiet about.

Large wind farms can look ugly and, because they are normally situated in rural locations, are perceived by many as spoiling the beauty of the natural environment. People living close to wind farms often claim that they are noisy. The noise level 300 metres away from a wind turbine is around 43 decibels, roughly the same as that in a kitchen from a typical domestic fridge.

Large wind farm in Oregon – Image from Wikimedia Commons

Opponents of wind farms often point to the increase in bird fatalities.  However, this is often overstated and many other man-made activities cause a much greater number of bird deaths. For example, in the USA in 2013, wind turbines were estimated to be responsible for 100,000 to 440,000 bird deaths whereas cats were responsible for between 365 million and 1 billion and up to 80 million birds were killed by cars.


Even through the total number of bird fatalities are relatively low. Some studies have shown that wind farms affect birds of prey disproportionately. This may be because certain types of bird like vultures have blind spots in their visual field which mean they cannot see objects directly in front of them (such as wind turbines) when flying.

However, the environmental damage due to solar power is relatively limited. Although large solar farms need to cover significant amount of land, the impact can be miminised by building them in dry desert areas, which have relatively little vegetation. Smaller scale installations can be created by covering the roofs of existing buildings with solar panels, which has virtually no environmental impact.

The Topaz solar farm built in the California desert. The farm covers a total area of 19 km2 (not all of which is covered with solar panels) and generates around 1.25 TWh of electricity per annum.


Interestingly, even geothermal energy has a significant environmental impact. Fluids drawn from deep underground carry a mixture of gases, notably carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide (which nowadays is spelt with an ‘f’ rather than a ‘ph’ even in the UK) methane and ammonia. If released into the atmosphere these pollutants contribute to global warming and acid rain.

Availability of  energy

With the sole exception of the polar regions in the winter, every location on the Earth gets some sunlight. For example, in the cloudy north west of Scotland the solar irradiance averaged out over a year is 72 Watts per square metre, about one fifth of its value in the cloudless desert areas near the equator.

In contrast, because hydroelectricity is generated by the kinetic energy of rapidly moving water, it requires both large volumes of moving water and also a height gradient so that the water moves rapidly. A country with a large flat terrain would not be able to generate much hydroelectric power.

Wind farms need to be built in places where the wind is strong and reliable. In general, a wind speed of at least 25 km/h averaged out over the year is needed to make wind farms economic.  This means that wind farms are located in coastal areas, at the tops of rounded hills, open plains and gaps in mountains and increasingly (particularly in the UK) offshore


Small scale generation

A key advantage of solar power is its ability to generate electricity on pretty much any scale. A single solar panel has exactly the same efficiency as a large array of a million panels. A panel 1 metre square will generate up to 250 watts of electricity, if connected to a rechargeable battery it  can provide a cheap and reliable source of electricity. This is particularly useful in the world’s poorest countries which are mostly situated at sunnier latitudes and have a more modest demand for electricity compared to richer countries. Once the initial cost of installation has been paid the running costs of a solar array are very low.

In contrast,  small wind turbines are not as efficient as larger turbines and so need to be situated in an area of above average wind in order to generate reasonable amounts of power. They also require a very smooth airflow: the smaller turbines are very susceptible to turbulence – so if you live near trees, or in a built-up area, a wind turbine is unlikely to be efficient.

Small scale hydroelectric plants which generate less than 10 kw are known as pico hydro systems and although they are relatively cheap to build, need a constant supply of water running downhill and have moving parts which need to be serviced and maintained.

Providing electricity to off grid communities

A recent BBC radio programme made the point that for people living without electricity, the day ends just after sunset. Light at night needs to supplied by candles or by kerosene lamps. Candles are dim and don’t last. Kerosene is expensive and gives off toxic fumes. The programme claimed that kerosene lanterns and cooking stoves cause an estimated two million deaths every year, but did not provide any evidence for this. (see note below). There is also a  fire risk. Homes made of wood or other natural materials are highly flammable, at constant risk from candle flames and kerosene spills.

Solar panels, connected to rechargeable batteries, change almost every aspect of this rural domestic existence. electricity on tap at home for lighting and cooking means that children, and adults are not only healthier, because they’re not exposed to toxic fumes but can study at night, improving their education and therefore their futures. It also enables them to easily charge mobile phone batteries  and so become part of the global community.

I hope you’ve enjoyed this post. To find out more about the Science Geek’s blog, click here or at the Science Geek Home link at the top of this page.

In my next post I’ll talk about the costs of solar energy and how it is becoming cheaper and cheaper over time.



  1. Hazards of cooking with kerosene

According to Lam et al (2013), combined studies that evaluated kerosene cooking provided some limited evidence that the fumes may impair lung function, promote asthma, and increase infectious illness and cataract risks. However, the paper goes on to say that studies are few, study designs and quality are varied, and results are inconsistent, limiting any conclusions that can be drawn.


2. Definitions

There are two different ways of generating electricity from sunlight.

  • One way is to concentrate the Sun’s energy using mirrors onto a small area and use the heat generated to produce steam to turn a turbine which generates electricity. This is known as Concentrated Solar Power (CSP)
  • The other way is use arrays of photovoltaic cells (more commonly known as solar panels) to generate electricity directly from sunlight. Around 98% of solar electricity is generated this way and throughout this post when I refer to solar energy or solar electricity I mean electricity generated this way


Our world in data (2018) Global renewable energy consumption over the long-run, Available at: (Accessed: 15 April 2019).

Science Direct (2014) The UK solar energy resource and the impact of climate change, Available at: 15 April 2019).

Lam N. L., Smith K. R., Gauthier A, Bates N M (2013) Kerosene: a review of household uses and their hazards in low and middle income countries, Available at: (Accessed: 15 April 2019).

27 thoughts on “Advantages of solar energy”

  1. I like how you mentioned that one of the advantages of solar energy is that every location of the Earth gets some kind of sunlight. Is solar energy more effective in areas that don’t get a lot of rain? If you live in an area that has mostly clear skies during the year, investing in solar power seems like a good idea.


    1. The short answer is that I don’t know. I would assume that must depend where about in world you live.

      In north west England where I live, which receives relatively little sunlight compared to the world average I haven’t seen any compelling evidence that installing solar panels increases (or for that matter reduces) property value.

      Although many companies which sell solar panel may claim otherwise 😉


  2. I like what you said about solar energy being more available because almost everywhere in the world has sunlight. My parents are considering getting a solar energy system installed for our home so that we can preserve energy. I will be sure to pass along all of the information you provided so that my parents can make a more informed decision.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I’m glad to know that the damage done to the environment because of solar power is limited. I love the environment and want to keep it as healthy as possible. I’ll look into investing in some solar panels for my home.


  4. The upfront cost of solar is not an issue for many poorer communities these days. For simple Solar systems that include power points for phones and even TV systems, many companies are providing pay as you go systems with the upfront cost paid for by private investors. This has the dual advantage of allowing people to pay out their weekly earnings, as they would to pay for alternatives like kerosene, but also ensures maintenance costs are covered and reliability of equipment, one of the problems with early adopters where the supply chain was unreliable. BBOXX and Greenlight are two such companies, with investment platforms like Trine and Energise Africa providing private investment opportunities for small investors.


  5. My husband and I have been thinking about switching our home’s energy system to a more renewable source so that we can do our part to help out the environment. I like that you said that one of the benefits of solar energy is that pretty much every place on Earth gets sunlight, so it can work almost anywhere. I think that would be especially good for us since we live in a sunny area, so we’ll have to look into getting some solar panels for our home.


    1. Every year, technologies in the field of solar cell production are becoming more and more advanced – thin-film modules are introduced directly into building materials at the stage of construction of structures. Special platforms like are being created to simplify green production management. Modern advances in nanotechnology and quantum physics can talk about a possible increase in the capacity of solar panels by 3 times.


  6. Your efforts in gathering those most interesting statistics are greatly appreciated. With climate change being such a hot topic, the pressure is on not only politicians but all of us to change the way we manage our energy use. I’ve been on the North Sea a few times and am always amazed by the huge arrays of wind turbines which have been constructed since my first trip to an oil rig in the early 1970s. I have heard the argument that they kill birds and whilst I would not wish to ignore this criticism, I’m impressed by the relative low incidence of bird deaths compared to other hazards. Whilst the environmental impact of wind farms (on land) can be huge, I believe the same can’t be said for offshore, where I suppose endangered species of bird are not at risk. The huge growth in solar energy use is impressive and we should certainly keep working on that.


    1. Thank you for your interesting comments.

      I think solar energy will have bigger and bigger role to play as the prices of panels continues to fall and their efficiency increases (even in the cloudy Uk 🙂 ) . At the moment without heavy subsidies small domestic wind turbines (power output < 10k W) are not cost effective for homes in the UK.

      However as you say offshore wind farms definitely have a big future and the UK plans to generate 30% of its electricity using offshore wind by the year 2030.

      Liked by 1 person

  7. What do you think about the merits of installing solar panels on rooftops in northern Europe vs building large solar farms in arid regions like north Africa?


    1. An interesting question!
      I could probably write an entire post about the pros and con of b<em>uilding large solar farms in relatively unpopulated African sunny desert areas vs putting them on the rooftops of existing building in Northern Europe.

      It certainly true that the costs per kilowatt of electricity from large desert solar farms would be lower because of the economies of scale, cheaper costs of installation, and the fact that these location get more sunlight.
      But would countries in Northern Europe want to be dependent on countries in Northern Africa for most of our electricity?


  8. Something worth mentioning about wind power: Turbines are terribly inefficient, as well as having that ‘danger to birds’ problem. However, there’s a new type of wind-power thing (I have no idea what they’re called) that has no outer moving parts to confuse and endanger flying birds, and it’s also a lot more efficient, doesn’t break down nearly as often as turbines do, etc. (I heard about these things from my twin, who currently works for a rural electric co-op.) Basically, it’s a large pole that vibrates from wind passing over it, and it converts that movement into electricity.


    1. Thank you. It sounds very interesting ! If you find out more and send a link (reply to this comment) that would be great.

      The other issues with turbines are that they can only put in windy places and the initial cost are higher than an similarly rated solar installation

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.