COP27 November 2022

Over the next few weeks much of the world’s media will be focused on Sharm El Sheik in Egypt, where the United Nations Climate Change conference is taking place. My own view is that our chances of significantly reducing carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere over the next 10-15 years or so don’t look particularly promising – mainly because there is the competing objective of individual countries seeking to maximise their short-term economic growth. I have re-blogged my post from 2021 on this topic. Since writing this global carbon dioxide levels have risen a further 2 parts per million.


In early November 2021 much of the world’s media was focussed on the Glasgow Climate Change Conference (also known as COP26). Its key objectives were to get individual states to commit to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, to end deforestation and to plan their move away from fossil fuel towards greener sources of energy. The overall goal being to reduce the global temperature rise which has happened over the last 100 years or so as a result of human activity.  Much has been written in the media about the outcome of the conference, therefore I won’t repeat it here. The statement by the UN Secretary General  gives a good overview.

Sadly, agreements made at Previous UN conferences to reduce greenhouse gases. In particular the Kyoto protocol in 1997 and the Paris agreement of 2015 have achieved very little. Although the COP26 target of limiting the global average temperature rise to 1.5oC from pre-industrial levels is claimed by some to be “still within reach”, it seems very unlikely it will be achieved. A recent article in Nature made the case that, even if the pledges announced in the Glasgow Climate Summit are implemented, average global temperatures will still rise by 2.4oC  by the year 2100. An article by a group of scientists who call themselves the Climate Action Tracker concluded that, based upon current behaviour, the likely global temperature rise from pre-industrial levels will be between 2oC  and 3.6oC by the end of the century.

Image credit Climate Action Tracker

For the rest of this post I’ll talk about how the concentration of the greenhouse gas which has contributed most to global warming, carbon dioxide, has risen in recent years and how it continues to rise because of the lack of effective action at a global level.

Carbon dioxide ( CO2) is released when fuels containing carbon (such as coal, oil and natural gas) are burnt. In addition, living creatures produce carbon dioxide when they respire. Carbon dioxide is removed from the atmosphere by plant life through photosynthesis. This is when carbon dioxide and water, using the energy from sunlight, combine together to produce complex carbohydrates (starches), releasing oxygen in the process.

The Rise in Carbon Dioxide levels

The graph below plots the mean atmospheric CO2 , measured in parts per million (ppm), since 2016. The red dots represent the CO2 level in the middle of the month.

Data from (since writing this post the steady upward trend has continued)

One interesting fact is the seasonal variation in carbon dioxide levels. This is a consequence of there being much more vegetation in the higher latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere  compared to the equivalent latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere, which are mainly covered in deep ocean. In April and May, atmospheric CO2  levels are at their highest. As the Northern Hemisphere plant growth season progresses, CO2 levels fall because more CO2 is removed from the atmosphere by photosynthesis than is added, with the minimum CO2 level being reached in September. From October until [Northern Hemisphere] spring there is comparatively little plant growth in the Northern Hemisphere and CO2 levels rise.

In the graph above, the black line shows the CO2 levels smoothed out to remove this seasonal variation. This shows a steady rise in the average CO2 levels. This is even more evident if we look below at the pattern over the last sixty years.

Data from

There has been a rise in the CO2 levels from around 317 ppm in 1960 to 414 ppm in 2020 – an increase of 32%. The increase has been a result of two factors:

  • The greater consumption of fossil fuels – thus pumping more and more COinto the atmosphere
  • Clearing of large areas of forest and woodland (deforestation) has reduced the amount of CO2. removed from the atmosphere.

Worse still, the rate of increase of CO2 levels is also rising.

  • Between 1960 and 1965 the atmospheric CO2 concentration rose from 316.9 ppm to 320.0 ppm – a rise of 3.1 ppm.
  • However, between 2015 and 2020 it rose from 401.0 ppm to 414.2 ppm – a rise of 13.2 ppm.

With a growing population (in 1960 the world population was 3 billion and today it is nearly 8 billion) and rising living standards, we as a species have been producing more COand we’ve reduced a significant fraction of the Earth’s surface covered by woodland which removes it.

According to an article in Nature, in 2019 deforestation in Brazil spiked. Nearly 10,000 km2 of forest was destroyed as the country put economic growth before protecting the rainforest – the largest loss of rainforest in a decade.

Rise in the use of Fossil Fuels

The diagram below shows the amount of COemitted by burning fossil fuels. At present, 35 billion tonnes are released into the atmosphere per year, which equates to roughly 4.5 tonnes for each person on Earth.

Data from

Coal – the largest contributor to carbon dioxide emissions

Coal consists mostly of carbon with variable amounts of other elements, chiefly hydrogen, sulfur, oxygen, and nitrogen. It is formed when dead plant matter decays firstly into peat and is then converted to coal by the heat and pressure of deep burial over millions of years. Coal is the largest contributor to CO2 emissions. Burning coal has other unpleasant effects. It produces smoke and toxic compounds which are responsible for air pollution and are generally hazardous to human health. One of the toxic compounds is the poisonous gas sulfur dioxide which is converted to sulfuric acid – responsible for acid rain. The graph below shows world coal consumption between 1990 and 2020. As you can see, coal consumption peaked in 2013 and has since declined slightly. The reduction in Europe and North America has been counteracted by the rise in Asia, particularly in the rapidly growing economies of India and China.

Change in coal consumption from 1990 to 2020. The vertical axis is in megatonne oil equivalents (one megatonne oil equivalent is equal to about 11.6 billion kwh or 11.6 Terawatt hours)

Data from

To have a realistic chance of meeting the Paris Agreement’s 1.5˚C warming limit, there would need to be an agreement to phase out fired power stations by 2030 in the OECD countries, and globally by 2040. This will not happen. Many countries including: China, India, Indonesia, Vietnam,  Japan, South Korea and Australia, have plans which imply that coal will be a major contributor to electricity generation in 2030.  In fact India intends to increase its domestic coal production over the next few years to meet its rapidly increasing energy demands. Both India and China insisted that the final wording of the COP26 agreement included the rather ambiguous statement “phase down coal” rather than the stronger “phase out coal”.

Oil – rising consumption

Crude oil consists mainly of hydrocarbons (compounds of hydrogen and carbon). It is converted in refineries into lighter hydrocarbons which are used for fuel and industrial processes. When hydrocarbons are burnt they produce carbon dioxide and water. (Small amounts of other toxic compounds are produced as well.)

Consumption of oil has steadily increased over the last 30 years, although there was a drop in 2020 due to the covid pandemic. When the world’s economy recovers, it is likely that consumption will increase – unless urgent action is taken. 

If we look at the world as a whole, most of the increase has been in Asia. A key factor has been the rise in living standards in China and India, which have a combined population of nearly three billion.

Data from

Much of the world’s crude oil is refined into fuel for motor vehicles, mainly. gasoline (known as petrol in the UK) or diesel. To reduce CO2   emissions many countries have plans to move away from the internal combustion engine to electric vehicles (EVs). The UK intends to ban the sale of new petrol and diesel cars and vans  by the year 2030, although new hybrid cars can be sold until 2035. Many nations made the pledge in Glasgow that new car and van sales would be EV-only by 2040. Sadly, many major countries did not do this. The noticeable countries which were not willing to commit to this target included Russia, China, Australia , (somewhat surprisingly ) Germany and the largest car market in the world the USA.

Natural Gas – rapidly rising consumption

Natural gas typically consists of around 85% to 90% of the hydrocarbon gas methane (which itself is a potent greenhouse gas). The remainder mainly consists of heavier hydrocarbon gases, including ethane, propane and butane. Being a mix of hydrocarbons, natural gas burns to produce carbon dioxide and water. It is a relatively clean fuel and produces little in the way of other pollutants.

The vertical axis is measured in billion cubic metres (bcm) of gas. One bcm is equivalent to 10.6 billion kw/h or 10.6 Tw/h

Data from

Natural gas consumption has increased steadily over the last 30 years. In the UK, which is fairly typical of Europe, natural gas provides 84% of its heating needs and I (like most of the UK’s population) live in a home heated by gas. Although the UK will ban new houses from being heated by gas in 2025, gas boilers can to be sold until 2035 to be fitted to existing accommodation . This means that, given the lifetime of a boiler is typically 15-20 years, in 2050 a substantial fraction of UK homes will still be heated by gas. As coal-fired power stations have been phased out, the amount of electricity generated by natural gas has increased and today 34.5% of the UK’s electricity is generated by burning natural gas.

The increasing use of natural gas does not fit with a goal of drastically reducing net CO2 emissions to zero. Although natural gas produces less CO2  and far less toxic compounds such as sulfur dioxide than coal, to dramatically reduce CO2  emissions it needs to be phased out globally in the coming decades. However, at present this is not happening. In Southeast Asia, heavily coal-dependent countries are now considering a switch from coal to gas, rather than coal to renewables. Large infrastructure projects for natural gas are under development in:

  • Europe – e.g. Nord Stream 2 for imports from Russia – although this has now been put on hold
  • Canada – expansions of the existing pipeline network to deliver gas for export
  • the USA – increasing the transport of liquid natural gas (LNG) ),

also many African countries are promoting the increased production and use of natural gas.

Another issue with natural gas is that methane is a gas at normal conditions (it boils at -162 oC) and has a low density. At room temperature and standard pressure, one tonne of methane has a volume 1500 cubic metres, whereas one tonne of petrol (gasoline) takes up 1.3 cubic metres. If large quantities of methane are to be stored it needs to be kept at low temperatures in liquid form or compressed to high pressures. This makes storage more difficult than oil or coal. Most countries in Europe don’t have the capability to stockpile large amounts of natural gas, needed to cover a winter’s demand, and are thus vulnerable to supply issues. Over this last year the war in Ukraine has exacerbated these supply issues.

And finally …..

I hope you’ve found this post interesting. Unfortunately, at the moment the chances of reducing the carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere in the medium term or so don’t look particularly promising. There will always be the competing objectives of individual countries seeking to maximise their short-term economic growth on the one hand and the global need to reduce carbon dioxide emissions on the other hand.

10 thoughts on “COP27 November 2022”

  1. Short-term interests are definitely an obstacle, but the situation is more complicated than that. Climate change is a unique environmental problem and the most complicated one we’ve ever faced. Acid rain was abated essentially because all you had to do was get companies to install SO₂ scrubbers, and they even got to make gyprock as a side product. Ozone depletion involved substituting one coolant for another; ditto for anti-knocking agents in gasoline, which vastly reduced lead intoxication in children. Globally, only 25 % of greenhouse gases come from electricity and heat production based on fossil fuels. Even that is a huge challenge to abate because as promising as solar and wind energy are, they are not practical everywhere on earth. Similarly the technologies that are more central and more continuous in their delivery of electricity like hydro and nuclear face opposition when new projects are proposed. Moreover, nuclear is both very expensive to build from scratch and also to maintain. 24% of greenhouse gases come from agriculture, land use and forest depletion. The slight decrease in meat consumption in the Western world has been offset by a growing appetite from a large number of people living elsewhere.When peat soils are drained for oil palm plantations ( and the rate has doubled in the last 15 years), the greenhouse emissions are several times larger than the carbon loss from the forest biomass when averaged over 30 years. Industrial processes ( steel, cement, etc) are responsible for `1/5 th of emissions and transportation for 14%. Here greener technologies are either in the infant stage ( electric planes, ships, electrolytic methods in steel production) or if they’re mature as in the case of electric cars, the purchase of such vehicles and their infrastructures is off to a very slow start. Further complicating the entire matter is that prices of tar, foam, plastics, raw chemicals in general etc that are derived from fossil fuels is linked to the amount of petroleum distilled and to the amount of natural gas extracted. If less is used by consumers and industry for transportation and production, all that stuff will be far more expensive, unless alternatives are found. But that’s hardly on the radar of government, researchers and investors.


    1. Thank you for some interesting observations.

      Another factor, which isn’t discussed as much as should be, is the steady rise in the Earth’s population, which recently surpassed 8 billion. This (together with the general increase in average living standards) has given rise to increase in consumption of the world’s resources which has led to the steady inexorable in rise carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Yes and it’s ignored for the wrong reasons. Overpopulation was a major focus in the 1970s. Unfortunately, it led to sterilizations without consent. But merely because the wrong means were used to tackle a real problem does not mean that we should pretend that it’s no longer an issue. It continues to be, as you say, a stress on resources, and it definitely is linked to climate change. For example, according to the EPA, since 1970, the United States’ carbon emissions have increased by 90%. But it’s not just the overdependence on fossil fuels and energy-intensive agriculture that’s responsible per se. In that period the American population has gone from 205 to 330 million, an increase of 61%. There have an increasing number of people within its borders driving cars, cooling and heating their homes, demanding more fuel, concrete and meat.


  2. I’m close to despair of a quick solution, though I keep hoping. A word I continually hear is “growth” – and I don’t mean the trees. If we are to save the planet, we need to stop focussing on economic growth, because there is nowhere to grow to. People and planet before profit!


    1. Very true, but it is an argument that I don’t hear very often. . Many world leaders are very keen on attending summits but there has been very little effective action at a global level and co2 level continue to rise steadily

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Thanks for another interesting article Steve.

    If NASA told us a massive asteroid would destroy civilisation in a few years time, people would unanimously demand action to avoid a catastrophe.

    I don’t think the general population understand the severity of the problem the world is facing with climate change. We are paving the way for a catastrophe beyond our comprehension.

    For many years I’ve followed the CO2, methane and nitrous oxide measurements produced at the Australian CSIRO station at Cape Grimm in Tasmania. Whatever we are doing down here is having no effect up there. The rise in greenhouse gases is relentless. There is not even the slightest hint of a down turn.

    The outlook is very bad for our children and grandchildren.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes it is very disappointing. World leaders seem to be happy to attend summits such as COP27, where these problems are discussed., but as we all know it much easier to discuss problem, as pose in photo shoots for the world’s media and than it is to take effective action.
      What is undeniable is that each year the mean atmospheric CO2 levels steadily rise by 2 ppm. The steadily rising world population, which has just hit billion doesn’t help matters either

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.